IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Sun, 28 June 2020 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5963A0DA2; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YNrhDt9KFPR; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181DA3A0D8B; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05SG2xbD011188; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:08:31 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 31xm5hw8bu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:08:30 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 05SG8T1K123250; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:08:30 -0500
Received: from zlp30494.vci.att.com (zlp30494.vci.att.com [135.46.181.159]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 05SG8Oj3123164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:08:24 -0500
Received: from zlp30494.vci.att.com (zlp30494.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30494.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 1C7F84005C32; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:08:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clph811.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.107.12]) by zlp30494.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id E8D534005C31; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:08:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 05SG8NsM052592; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:08:23 -0500
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 05SG8I4P052458; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:08:18 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A9B10A18F8; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njbdcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::8c6b:4b77:618f:9a01%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:08:16 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
CC: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
Thread-Index: AQHWTIyZvXQz0VhNUkW5CnKGDiRZYajuKL2QgABM7gD//71r8A==
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:08:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0108A69B34@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <159326696737.10306.5653213903966509356@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0108A69B10@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <CACsn0ckcZ8Wp3oruRsBnv3r846ea0CQ4pgVKhFdQV3uXArKm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckcZ8Wp3oruRsBnv3r846ea0CQ4pgVKhFdQV3uXArKm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [69.141.203.172]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-28_11:2020-06-26, 2020-06-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 cotscore=-2147483648 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006280118
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/z9IKFcNiucwMIrTL7UuOFnn-Dkk>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:08:42 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Watson Ladd [mailto:watsonbladd@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 12:05 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>
> Cc: secdir@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@ietf.org;
> last-call@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
> 
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:55 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> <acm@research.att.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > >
> > > Now for the meat: what about the security considerations? Since this
> draft is
> > > describing enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the
> measurements
> > > taken by such enhanced traceroutes, the security impact is minimal and
> the
> > > authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of
> > > tracroutes on networks.
> > [acm]
> > I'm looking for the action implied in your comment.  Do we add the
> sentences:
> >
> > This draft describes enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the
> measurements taken by such enhanced traceroute tools. The security impact
> is minimal and the authors reference the existing RFCs describing the
> security impacts of active and hybrid measurements on networks (of which
> traceroute measurements are a subset) below.
> 
> My apologies: you read as a suggestion which I thought was a
> description. I don't think it has to change at all.
[acm] 

Thanks for your very fast clarification, Watson!
Al

> 
> >
> > Or?
> >
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Watson Ladd
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
> --Rousseau.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email