IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)

john.loughney@nokia.com Wed, 27 October 2004 04:32 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA01986 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMfhn-0004Cw-6d for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:46:40 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMfQE-0006Rz-TA; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:28:30 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CM2D1-0000Az-S4 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:36:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11365 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-x4.nokia.com ([131.228.20.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM2QR-00037b-IX for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:50:09 -0400
Received: from esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (esdks002.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.121]) by mgw-x4.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i9PAa2l05296; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:36:03 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:39 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.31 2004060815 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i9PAZdTm031059; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:39 +0300
Received: from mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.97) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com 00TQt82r; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:38 EEST
Received: from esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.84]) by mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i9PAZcS03665; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:38 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebe003.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.39]) by esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:37 +0300
Received: from esebe056.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.51]) by esebe003.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:36 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:35:13 +0300
Message-ID: <3CF661B1787ABF41A869BE20108F8D6D1FFE11@esebe056.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)
Thread-Index: AcS6d6PJ2CTTz8nXRUiLkcxm5b5TDgABpZYg
To: pekkas@netcore.fi
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2004 10:35:36.0224 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D017A00:01C4BA7E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:28:23 -0400
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com, harald@alvestrand.no, ipr-wg@ietf.org, newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: RE: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Pekka,

> This is actually caused by by the IETF secretariat, I think, due to 
> the way they process email attachments.  I send them a draft with 
> single line breaks, but the output always has two.

That is annoying ...
 
> I guess I should try to send them a link rather than an attachment..
> 
> > 2) Provide a little more motivation for this.  Maybe its Monday, but reading
> >    the draft right now, I couldn't really see what problem this draft is 
> >    solving.  Perhaps its just that we don't have enough process already, so
> >    a little more is better.
> 
> True enough.  The justification is simple: to bring out IPR issues
> forth more openly, so that those to which those may be a problem can
> better form their opinion.

Add something like that to the next revision.

John

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email