IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Normatively referenced specifications

Michael Cameron <michael.cameron@ericsson.com> Wed, 18 December 2013 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.cameron@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D2A1ADF83 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0ZFeaz5Kwg1 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2C1ADF99 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:35 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f278e000005a8f-b3-52b1ea03a2ff
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D6.A0.23183.30AE1B25; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:31:31 +0100 (CET)
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:31:19 -0500
From: Michael Cameron <michael.cameron@ericsson.com>
CC: "ipr-wg@ietf.org" <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Normatively referenced specifications
Thread-Topic: Normatively referenced specifications
Thread-Index: AQHO+wYsgxWEy05JX02ltlZg0bWAbZpaRR0hgABV7YD//61XwA==
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:31:18 +0000
Message-ID: <36BAA6A693139D4BBCB37CCCA660E08A02B881CD@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <CED46C85.AC4EC%stewe@stewe.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131217001052.0c5bff98@resistor.net> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026ECD3A9B@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131218001051.0c266ed0@resistor.net> <CED70C71.119D0%dmohlenh@cisco.com> <52B1CF27.3010905@joelhalpern.com> <52B1DE0C.8010201@dcrocker.net> <52B1E6F0.5060808@joelhalpern.com> <52B1E8C7.90400@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <52B1E8C7.90400@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrC7zq41BBrM7bSzefvjC7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujO33X7IWPGOpuHV8GlsD43/mLkZODgkBE4mFC08zQthiEhfu rWfrYuTiEBI4wiix8vIxNpCEiICMxNzZj1khEssZJS5v62fqYuTgYAPqfv6MBaSGWUBdomPu Y3aQsLCAkcTkTaYQrcYS/5oPskPYThK/vjwFs1kEVCVW9txnArF5BXwlztzsY4YY38Qs8eDn CrCDOAW0JFb92cQKYjMCHff91BomiF3iEreezGeCOFpAYsme81DPiEq8fPyPFcJWlvg+5xHU bToSC3Z/YoOwtSWWLXzNDLFYUOLkzCcsExjFZiEZOwtJyywkLbOQtCxgZFnFyFFanFqWm25k sIkRGBHHJNh0dzDueWl5iFGag0VJnPfLW+cgIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYz+ z/QU1sf+u7OF/12/9zfmbrko9ZOiaRVLJ0nPMdm0xWntjNjL6xmCryt23theku4iYRLidTzh 2mvpHtOcO0qf257fifu4/ZDsOvGDh5gNJ7gdt13y+5LZd915y+S4fx2JqnB0qv0W8XNN3r6H 03N9ZxoqPnPl2bh+2/V/MmuqpLj4A8WM9c2VWIozEg21mIuKEwGb73BjVgIAAA==
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:31:37 -0000

>>Whereas I read the challenging part of this discussion as having to do with requirements for disclosure.  Certainly the assertions in the thread that gave me pause were ones that claimed clever, nuanced interpretations of our rules in order to avoid disclosure.

>>Once IPR is disclosed, how the IETF chooses to deal with that information might indeed get complicated, nuanced or whatever.

Agreed!

d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email