IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Issue found in RFC 3667 text

"Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> Thu, 29 April 2004 18:00 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17269 for <ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFfi-0006t6-SS for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:50:07 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3THo6Vd026469 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:50:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFde-0005xE-Sd for ipr-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:47:58 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16308 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:47:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJFdZ-0006G9-DC for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:47:53 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJFcj-0005vQ-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:47:02 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJFbj-0005aI-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:45:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFFl-00072o-MZ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:23:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJF0O-0003V4-FB for ipr-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:07:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14104 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJF0J-0002qo-A2 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:07:19 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJEzN-0002ZR-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:06:21 -0400
Received: from mail26f.sbc-webhosting.com ([216.173.237.180]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJEyM-00023s-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:05:18 -0400
Received: from www.rosenlaw.com (216.173.242.124) by mail26f.sbc-webhosting.com (RS ver 1.0.92vs) with SMTP id 1-0978247996; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: lrosen@rosenlaw.com
From: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
To: 'Fred Baker' <fred@cisco.com>, "'Contreras, Jorge'" <Jorge.Contreras@haledorr.com>
Cc: sob@harvard.edu, ipr-wg@ietf.org, rbarr@cisco.com
Subject: RE: Issue found in RFC 3667 text
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:59:56 -0800
Organization: Rosenlaw & Einschlag
Message-ID: <001001c42e13$c89bb340$9e7ba8c0@Rosenlaw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01C42DD0.BA787340"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040428062836.0623f328@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Sender: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60

Jorge Contreras wrote:

It seems that in a case where the license is free and is extended in any
case except if the licensing company sues mine (Cisco's practice on such
things), this should be sufficient. 

 

I agree that it should be sufficient if a free license to the patent is
extended. But that is the very thing that is missing from the IETF policy.
No such license is required. 

 

So what is "sufficient" isn't provided.

 

/Larry Rosen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email