IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue found in RFC 3667 text

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 28 April 2004 22:35 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA00111 for <ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:35:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIxZh-0002Mh-NP for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:30:42 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3SMUfxY009092 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:30:41 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIxMN-0005Fi-G5 for ipr-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:16:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA28643 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIxMJ-0005MG-Du for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:16:51 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIxLf-0005FK-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:16:11 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIxKh-00057V-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:15:11 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIxBp-0004hB-8G; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:06:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BItqE-0004jT-8l for ipr-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:31:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA05874 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:31:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BItqA-0005W7-CS for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:31:26 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BItpD-0005Ti-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:30:27 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BItp1-0005RL-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:30:15 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2004 10:41:42 +0000
Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3SIRrC1008373; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CSCOAMERA19540.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with SMTP id ASN07552; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20040428101616.05526e90@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
X-Sender: fred@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:18:51 -0700
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Issue found in RFC 3667 text
Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, ipr-wg@ietf.org, jorge.contreras@haledorr.com, rbarr@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <481841671.1083145851@halvestr-w2k1>
References: <200404280149.SAA04765@irp-view7.cisco.com> <20040428024301.700681CB1CB@newdev.harvard.edu> <6.1.0.6.2.20040427195038.04d248c8@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com> <481841671.1083145851@halvestr-w2k1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-==-----======-==-===---=--==--==-=-=-==-----=-"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Sender: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

At 09:50 AM 04/28/04 -0700, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>Re the original subject of this thread (the race condition): This should 
>be filed as an errata on RFC 3667. The intent of the WG was completely 
>clear in list discussions (allow filings of IPR within reasonable time 
>(days) after I-D publication), and the fact that the RFC does not reflect 
>the WG consensus is a bug.

So what is the correct text that every new internet draft should start with?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email