Re: A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure pages

> you mean the RF and the non-RF cases?

(too early) - yes

> the important part in the generic disclosure is that RF is required to 
> avoid the need for specific disclosures according to RFC 3668.

sorry - I did not see that you were only refering to generic disclosures
if so then your suggestion is fine - but what about the case where 
the RFC declaration is not a generic one (i.e. one for a specific
ID only)

> but saying that the statement is RF is another field in the form, so we can 
> get all that information without having it on this checkbox.

sorry - I did not parse the above bit

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg