Re: Generic IPR Disclosures

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 08 May 2014 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6063C1A00D5 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 12:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17p9xiDwo3Zs for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F601A00B5 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s48JjhlQ012753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 May 2014 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1399578350; bh=hbUCS7cZV/3hNey/4vCMPmCpW5DPzEUxQ9ijYMj/E3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=f65+bIPJQSnWELpsll2gg6I4qqZxiZbqP34OOsMBmYNxDBhHOwOtIR79ptQU3gaaI nD2U4N0r7Cc7FQTBSWrWWWMkE7KkXUgwly7sET60iCkJZEs+8ouydDZ9D+c87F87N4 +JX4y2Qdtle2oWezQsTguZe3zrJx34jRhbAlXTOk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1399578350; i=@resistor.net; bh=hbUCS7cZV/3hNey/4vCMPmCpW5DPzEUxQ9ijYMj/E3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=FbZhlZH44hyfdP+7yVWYwHTR+LEngGcO5PyDQ8ETuegWa+Id/RqY+dQTxmsI0uCGh RoQMboFn8IWHlLgudBOcDGAlCfS4twRbCPR+ebtBgsTboGDv1zqiME5rPgeyJhmHVF C36ZIPqnkeIvjVAevmySIXlHgE/9+90bhBGtCDXE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140508121030.0c166970@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:45:30 -0700
To: "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Generic IPR Disclosures
In-Reply-To: <F0BF319A-75E9-47BE-8018-27F9C4EAA474@harvard.edu>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140508112635.0b83b2b8@elandnews.com> <F0BF319A-75E9-47BE-8018-27F9C4EAA474@harvard.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-wg/Xzi7vewROjJkwO5u6HGxOkrV3e4
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 19:46:05 -0000

Hi Scott,
At 12:05 08-05-2014, Bradner, Scott wrote:
>not sure what is being asked here

Sorry about that.  I'll quote Section 6.1.3 of RFC 3979:

   "If a person has information about IPR that may Cover IETF
    Contributions, but the participant is not required to disclose
    because they do not meet the criteria in Section 6.6 (e.g., the IPR
    is owned by some other company), such person is encouraged to notify
    the IETF by sending an email message to ietf-ipr@ietf.org.  Such a
    notice should be sent as soon as reasonably possible after the person
    realizes the connection."

Is a person (as described in Section 6.1.3) encouraged to make a 
disclosure under Section 6.4.3 of RFC 3979?

 From what I gathered it would not be of much use as the person (as 
described in Section 6.1.3) would be stating his or her willingness 
to license IPR that he or she does not own directly or indirectly.

Regards,
-sm