RE: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)

john.loughney@nokia.com Wed, 27 October 2004 04:31 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA01938 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:31:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMfhI-0004CD-52 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:46:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMfQD-0006Rs-Fn; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:28:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CM0em-0005F5-37 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:56:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA02225 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:56:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-x3.nokia.com ([131.228.20.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM0sA-0000ue-O0 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:10:40 -0400
Received: from esdks004.ntc.nokia.com (esdks004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.159]) by mgw-x3.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i9P8uat14290; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:37 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:15 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.31 2004060815 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks004.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i9P8uFbx019548; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:15 +0300
Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks004.ntc.nokia.com 00yQxqcd; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:14 EEST
Received: from esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.84]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i9P8u1a04839; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:01 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebe018.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.57]) by esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:55:47 +0300
Received: from esebe056.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.51]) by esebe018.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:55:47 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:55:17 +0300
Message-ID: <3CF661B1787ABF41A869BE20108F8D6D1FFE0D@esebe056.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)
Thread-Index: AcS6a7lKEbe7VK7OQiCTZHIoJI+iUAABBSew
To: harald@alvestrand.no, pekkas@netcore.fi, john-ietf@jck.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2004 08:55:47.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BAD27B0:01C4BA70]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:28:23 -0400
Cc: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-04.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Pekka,

> --On lørdag, oktober 23, 2004 20:45:58 +0300 Pekka Savola 
> <pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:
> 
> >  2) 'from now on, if a new informational/experimental RFC is brought
> > forward which would not be IETF last called under the current policy,
> > it must be last called to bring forth the IPR for community review'.
> 
> I think this translates to "all documents that are not RFC-Editor 
> submissions, and where IPR is filed, must be Last-Called".
> 
> I think that's a reasonable thing to do, but it IS a new requirement (and 
> will in some cases slow down the publication process by 2-4 weeks).

OK, I am a little confused.  If what Harald is suggesting is what you mean,
than you need to explicitly state it.  

I'm in favor of including all IPR disclosers in IETF LCs.  A link to the 
relevant disclosure is fine.  However, I'm more worried about IPRs which
are not disclosed, thought I don't know what to do about that.

About the draft itself:

1) Fix the double blank line problem.
2) Provide a little more motivation for this.  Maybe its Monday, but reading
   the draft right now, I couldn't really see what problem this draft is 
   solving.  Perhaps its just that we don't have enough process already, so
   a little more is better.

thanks
John

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg