RE: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00 and the risk of "false RFCs"

Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com> Fri, 18 February 2005 20:08 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA05308 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:08:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D2EYk-00085P-0P for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:17:06 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D2E7a-0005cP-Kh; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:49:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D2DoZ-0007Lv-C7 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA29203 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D2EAG-0006vH-VW for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:51:50 -0500
Received: from eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM ([129.148.13.40]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1IJTJKw025963; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:29:20 -0700 (MST)
Received: from thunk (thunk.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.66]) by eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id j1IJTJOp012020; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thunk.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thunk (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1IJTIgU002483; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from sommerfeld@localhost) by thunk.east.sun.com (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j1IJTI78002482; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: thunk.east.sun.com: sommerfeld set sender to sommerfeld@sun.com using -f
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com>
To: lrosen@rosenlaw.com
In-Reply-To: <20050218134018.GA47441@mail26b.sbc-webhosting.com>
References: <20050218134018.GA47441@mail26b.sbc-webhosting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1108754957.28925.162.camel@thunk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.325
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:29:17 -0500
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00 and the risk of "false RFCs"
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 13:40, Lawrence Rosen wrote:

> There is no threat to anyone from modification of
> RFC documents after they are published, 

I don't think that's supportable; the threats posed by carelessly or
maliciously modified RFC's include at the very least end user 
confusion and failure of interoperability.  

The latter is particularly offensive to the core values of long term 
IETF participants.

						- Bill




_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg