Re: Problems with draft-ietf-ipr-subm-rights-fix

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 23 September 2004 09:15 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA24877 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:15:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAPoL-0003Ro-M0 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:22:45 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAPXj-0000e6-UK; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:05:35 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAPRq-00084m-HZ for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:59:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA23778 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:59:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAPYb-0003Ai-Cc for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:06:29 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4744561BDA; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02114-07; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:58:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D99461BE2; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:58:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:58:15 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, IPR WG <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C6F891DEF6843DFF9D30CE2F@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10409221325440.22916-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10409221325440.22916-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Problems with draft-ietf-ipr-subm-rights-fix
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On 22. september 2004 13:37 -0700 "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> wrote:

> One question, the draft refers to RFC XXXY as the replacement for RFC
> 3668. The last call didn't mention it, but I assume that RFC 3668 will
> indeed be updated (to point to the RFC 3667 replacement), as implied in
> the draft. Is that correct?

Yes, that is correct. I forgot to say it in the Last Call, but sent a 
message to ietf-announce some days later mentioning it.

               Harald




_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg