IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: clarification of blanket statement text

"Robert Barr " <rbarr@cisco.com> Tue, 22 February 2005 04:22 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA02111 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:22:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D3RvC-0001e0-Lq for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:45:19 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3M5P-00013C-4o; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:31:27 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3KCz-0001vQ-N6 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:31:09 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA11679 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:31:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D3KZF-0003wZ-Ej for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:54:10 -0500
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2005 12:32:25 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,104,1107763200"; d="scan'208"; a="162520063:sNHT20119252"
Received: from rbarrwxp ([10.32.226.46]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1LKUTwN024363; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200502212030.j1LKUTwN024363@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
From: Robert Barr <rbarr@cisco.com>
To: 'Powers Chuck-RXCP20' <Chuck.Powers@motorola.com>, "'Contreras, Jorge'" <Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com>, 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand' <harald@alvestrand.no>, "'George T. Willingmyre'" <gtw@gtwassociates.com>, 'Scott W Brim' <sbrim@cisco.com>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:30:29 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Thread-Index: AcUYTQ+AqAanKa1iRqqH9vJCnZg85gAALyIgAADZWZA=
In-Reply-To: <C81125A8DFFDB44683F2A87AB17FCD02082DED@il06exm62.ds.mot.com>
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621
X-from-outside-Cisco: [10.32.226.46]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: clarification of blanket statement text
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rbarr@cisco.com
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> However, those statement are still in effect for any work and/or
> contributions which preceeded the official adoption of RFC 3668, and
> this, too, should be made clear. 

I think we should leave that to the courts to decide, IMO 2026 is unclear on
the effect of such statements. 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email