Re: Generic IPR Disclosures
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 02:47 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9474A1A0144 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 19:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ytX1BD84_Sh for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 19:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFEB1A0143 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 19:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1WiaqE-0007Ew-FF; Thu, 08 May 2014 22:47:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:47:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Generic IPR Disclosures
Message-ID: <C5D47DCFBE3D7F5F658C600C@JCK-EEE10>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140508121030.0c166970@resistor.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140508112635.0b83b2b8@elandnews.com> <F0BF319A-75E9-47BE-8018-27F9C4EAA474@harvard.edu> <6.2.5.6.2.20140508121030.0c166970@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-wg/mnY3FvHiXIR8aaaM0iXJi3dhY7c
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 02:47:33 -0000
--On Thursday, 08 May, 2014 12:45 -0700 SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote: >... > From what I gathered it would not be of much use as the > person (as described in Section 6.1.3) would be stating his or > her willingness to license IPR that he or she does not own > directly or indirectly. Are you saying anything different from "a third party disclosure may identify IPR related to a particular specification but, obviously and logically, cannot make a binding statement about licensing terms."? john
- Generic IPR Disclosures SM
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures Bradner, Scott
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures SM
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures John C Klensin
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures SM
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures TGLASSEY
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures John C Klensin
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures TGLASSEY
- Re: Generic IPR Disclosures SM