Re: clarification of blanket statement text

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Thu, 24 February 2005 00:59 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03604 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D47j1-0006dS-Kv for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:23:32 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3kly-00066Z-Vu; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:53:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3OHN-0003s5-V4 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:51:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA06393 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:51:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D3Odf-000278-Oq for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:15:01 -0500
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2005 16:51:32 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Received: from cisco.com (ssh-sjc-1.cisco.com [171.68.225.134]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1M0pHYO020240 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:51:13 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20050222005113.GE1312@sbrim-w2k02>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
References: <C81125A8DFFDB44683F2A87AB17FCD02082DE2@il06exm62.ds.mot.com> <003f01c51846$35e1e060$0200a8c0@cp689344a>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <003f01c51846$35e1e060$0200a8c0@cp689344a>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: Re: clarification of blanket statement text
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 01:50:21PM -0500, George T. Willingmyre allegedly wrote:
> I have posted previously  a concern that the IP disclosure  template at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr.cgi  has elements beyond the
> mandatory requirements  from the IETF policy/procedure at
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3668.txt?number=3668  and from    the  Template
> for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3905.txt?number=3905   My concerns would be
> alleviated if those elements that go beyond the procedureal requirments were
> somehow labled or idenfified as such.  Can we have a discussion of this at
> the IPR WG meeting in Minneapolis?   Is there a date and time yet set?

George, the web forms are not policy, they are a tool.  If the policy
is clear, there is nothing for the WG to do.  If the web forms do not
comply with policy, I would inform the Secretariat or Harald (Hi
Harald).  We can make it the Administrative Director's problem when we
have one.

swb

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg