Re: [Ips] timeout for R2T PDUs?

"Deva Ranganathan" <deva.ranganathan@gmail.com> Thu, 06 November 2008 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ips-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6A13A69C4; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:20:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9033A69C4 for <ips@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:19:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lugzhdoIiFLn for <ips@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:19:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E33A69E8 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so565359wfd.31 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:19:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=RsTEuH//QFGul2fRpHXafVXTugUtmnreiF39DqnOO0M=; b=kl9GLge/fW9V6Wd1w72jUSsgZxzS5hk5uN6HwzFCgcwdx4WQ5/eVEMiEvG3N+4dqJx 411/uKs7/h3WRN4g48N4YPbFdg3Bvn5sPJ3+FK5M+cxvmZt2DWRrcjbLThxgfvIxJ5yP b04b6vWFf21SEjNUd3TLNf/nCgSnQPd2dmxPk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=gre0vLVt9VF7GFqgUblKC38tbYNUUIXHerdJquuTYZWkjdcL8043zjUcfMB+s0SBYR +M/3KHBaarDg0LzS80qKyLZjYXFm7UumZ5Ee3+TUFHNu3kUz7F+g/dmpNmX2nllYG+W4 YdMQJwvaiz43xZwtrIwUElrRVkTJ2XG+c4lSs=
Received: by 10.142.214.11 with SMTP id m11mr344013wfg.279.1225963191782; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.204.14 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8c87b47c0811060119i355671b7tef114a7f879ea44d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:49:51 +0530
From: Deva Ranganathan <deva.ranganathan@gmail.com>
To: Erez Zilber <erezzi.list@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8c87b47c0811060116s7cd827f2o820649d1ab08ddbd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ce513bcc0811052324u34a89556m6f3e575682781fe8@mail.gmail.com> <8c87b47c0811060116s7cd827f2o820649d1ab08ddbd@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: ips@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] timeout for R2T PDUs?
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ips>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1417519460=="
Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Deva Ranganathan <deva.ranganathan@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Erez,
>
> I think that this s a target implementation issue wherein the
> implementation can choose the timeout  depending on the availability of
> resources  and the software architecture. A target also has a NOP-IN sent
> periodically and can use this to cleanup  the stale resources as well.
>
> thanks
>
> Deva
> HCL Technologies.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Erez Zilber <erezzi.list@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I couldn't find an answer to the following question in iSCSI spec:
>>
>> During the execution of a WRITE command, an R2T PDU is sent from the
>> target to the initiator. What should happen if a bug in the initiator
>> causes it not to send the data-out PDU? Is there any timeout that will
>> allow the target to abort this command?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erez
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ips mailing list
>> Ips@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips