RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset
"Tony Battersby" <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Tue, 08 October 2002 18:22 UTC
Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.200]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25105 for <ips-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:22:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id g98HZ7i29207 for ips-outgoing; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from cybernetics.com (cyborg.cybernetics.com [206.246.200.18]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g98HZ5o29202 for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from condor ([137.157.1.224]) by cyborg.cybernetics.com with SMTP id <119047>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:34:53 -0400
Reply-To: tonyb@cybernetics.com
From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
To: 'Eddy Quicksall' <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>, ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:34:49 -0400
Message-ID: <000101c26ef1$0158b680$e0019d89@cybernetics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD205B7@ATLOPS>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eddy Quicksall [mailto:eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:09 PM > To: tonyb@cybernetics.com; ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset > > > I agree ... so what I said is correct; right? > > i.e., the statement in the spec is slightly incorrect in that > it says "Task > management requests must act on all the commands having a > CmdSN lower than > the task management CmdSN". That is not true because other > sessions' CmdSN's > have no relationship to the issuing sessions commands. Yes, I suppose it would be more precise to say "... must act on all the commands in the session having a CmdSN ...". Maybe this could be included in the next draft (if there is one)? There might be a few other places that could use this change also... Tony
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Tony Battersby
- iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Eddy Quicksall
- Re: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Julian Satran
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Tony Battersby
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Eddy Quicksall
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Eddy Quicksall
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Bill Studenmund
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Tony Battersby
- RE: iSCSI: Logical Unit Reset Julian Satran