[Ips] Multiple IQNs for a single iSCSI initiator (for XEN)

Erez Zilber <erezz@voltaire.com> Wed, 04 April 2007 06:56 UTC

Return-path: <ips-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYzPv-00074i-Sl; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:56:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYzPv-00074d-Al for ips@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:56:27 -0400
Received: from fwil.voltaire.com ([193.47.165.2] helo=exil.voltaire.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYzPt-0006Qw-Vi for ips@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:56:27 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.25.5.174]) by exil.voltaire.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:56:03 +0300
Message-ID: <46134C00.8090602@voltaire.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:56:00 +0200
From: Erez Zilber <erezz@voltaire.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, ips@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2007 06:56:03.0950 (UTC) FILETIME=[4FC738E0:01C77686]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: Eli Dorfman <Elid@voltaire.com>
Subject: [Ips] Multiple IQNs for a single iSCSI initiator (for XEN)
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

We'd like to run an iSCSI initiator on XEN on dom0. It will login for
each VM with a different IQN. The LUs for each VM will be visible for
that VM only. My questions are:

    * We didn't find anything against that in the iSCSI spec. Is it
      really ok to do that?
    * This question is for the open-iscsi community - what is required
      in order to implement that in open-iscsi? Is there any plan to do
      that?


Thanks,
-- 

____________________________________________________________

Erez Zilber | 972-9-971-7689

Software Engineer, Storage Team

Voltaire – _The Grid Backbone_

__

www.voltaire.com <http://www.voltaire.com/>




_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips