Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

"Pat Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com> Mon, 15 June 2009 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pthaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38443A6CC0; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DpGyWpcot-B; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MMS3.broadcom.com (mms3.broadcom.com [216.31.210.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE683A6A74; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.192.224] by MMS3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:07 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: B55A25B1-5D7D-41F8-BC53-C57E7AD3C201
Received: from SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.252.49.130]) by SJEXCHHUB01.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.224]) with mapi; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:07 -0700
From: "Pat Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com>
To: "Black_David@emc.com" <Black_David@emc.com>, "arkady.kanevsky@gmail.com" <arkady.kanevsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:17:05 -0700
Thread-Topic: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version
Thread-Index: AcnjyKvkptOEgm1dRES7kc7ggd6dTgKILcEAAABB2GAAAMsvQA==
Message-ID: <DBFBCB90599B2C46992032279293D10010A0A1058C@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02D37D4F@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com><517c62fb0906021425y6e4db28cm6b34a29eb497cd13@mail.gmail.com> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02F621B2@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02F621CD@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02F621CD@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 662841B93847906573-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_DBFBCB90599B2C46992032279293D10010A0A1058CSJEXCHCCR01co_
Cc: "imss@ietf.org" <imss@ietf.org>, "ips@ietf.org" <ips@ietf.org>, "storm@ietf.org" <storm@ietf.org>, "rddp@ietf.org" <rddp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:17:40 -0000

Did you mean "are not based on TCP" rather than "are not based on IP"?
Arkady was asking about connection setup for SCTP which the former fits but not the latter.

Regards,
Pat

________________________________
From: ips-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Black_David@emc.com; arkady.kanevsky@gmail.com
Cc: imss@ietf.org; ips@ietf.org; storm@ietf.org; rddp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version


And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David



________________________________
From: rddp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky@gmail.com
Cc: imss@ietf.org; ips@ietf.org; rddp@ietf.org; storm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,

I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David



________________________________
From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm@ietf.org; imss@ietf.org; ips@ietf.org; rddp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David@emc.com<mailto:Black_David@emc.com>> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm@ietf.org<mailto:storm@ietf.org> mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp@ietf.org<mailto:rddp@ietf.org>
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm@ietf.org<mailto:storm@ietf.org> mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com<mailto:black_david@emc.com>        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp@ietf.org<mailto:rddp@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky