Re: [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics
Steve Byan <stevebyan@mac.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 17:46 UTC
Return-Path: <stevebyan@mac.com>
X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F6028C344 for <ips@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fB6ldKKx6bp6 for <ips@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtpout016.mac.com (asmtpout016.mac.com [17.148.16.91]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C768B28C33D for <ips@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Received: from [10.97.16.86] ([216.240.26.4]) by asmtp016.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.03 (built Aug 7 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KFQ007R3K266S00@asmtp016.mac.com> for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:56 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A01A4E9A5@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
References: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A01A049EB@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A01A4E9A5@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
X-Priority: 1
Message-id: <11C4163C-A869-436B-BE0A-293FA66A1679@mac.com>
From: Steve Byan <stevebyan@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:46:54 -0500
To: IPS <ips@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Subject: Re: [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:46:59 -0000
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Black_David@emc.com wrote: > I wrote: > >> I'll try to get some discussion about STORM activity started >> on the IPS and RDDP lists - people have been entirely too >> polite in replying to me about the BOF in private, leading >> some IETF observers to interpret no traffic on these lists >> as lack of interest. >> >> In particular, I'm hoping to get >> some second level scoping (list of things to be done) >> for work items including the iSCSI revision for Draft >> Standard (what to leave out), SAM-4 support for iSCSI >> (what to put in), and iSER revisions based on InfiniBand >> implementations (what IETF should do vs. leave to the >> IBTA). > > Here are three topics that it would be useful to discuss: > > - What's important/useful about new features from SAM-4. I know > that there's interest in the new task management operations, > but what else? Anything added here needs a new text key to > negotiate it. Command priority would be useful. Status qualifiers would be nice to have, but I think are less useful than command priority. Best regards, -Steve -- Steve Byan <stevebyan@mac.com>
- [Ips] STORM BOF approval Black_David
- [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics Black_David
- Re: [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics Eddy Quicksall
- Re: [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics Black_David
- Re: [Ips] STORM BOF: Discussion topics Steve Byan