Re: request

jerome@psti.com Thu, 14 October 1999 19:12 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by mail.imc.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25763; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 12:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA29892 Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: jerome@psti.com
Message-ID: <19991014134145.A25243@jerome.psti.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:41:45 -0400
To: scott.davidson@iprg.nokia.com
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: request
Reply-To: jerome@psti.com
References: <NCBBIIIDALGGCGKAECNGOEEMCCAA.scott.davidson@iprg.nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.2
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIIIDALGGCGKAECNGOEEMCCAA.scott.davidson@iprg.nokia.com>; from Scott Davidson on Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 11:52:08AM -0400
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 11:52:08AM -0400, Scott Davidson wrote:
> Internet Key Exchange 
> The Internet Key Exchange or IKE that define how to exchange security
> keys for authentication and how to negotiate the parameters of
> individual virtual private networks. IKE was originally known as
> ISAKMP/Oakley and is an Internet Protocol Security standard.

does this mean that ISAKMP/Oakley are officially obsoleted by IKE ?

The following quote seems to present it more as a subset. 

"  This does not implement the entire Oakley protocol, but only a subset
   necessary to satisfy its goals. It does not claim conformance or
   compliance with the entire Oakley protocol nor is it dependant in any
   way on the Oakley protocol. " -- rfc2409.2 about IKE