No SPD

"K. SrinivasRao" <srinu@trinc.com> Tue, 17 March 1998 06:24 UTC

Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980317114244.006c6794@192.9.200.10>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:42:44 +0500
To: ipsec@tis.com
From: "K. SrinivasRao" <srinu@trinc.com>
Subject: No SPD
Cc: kent@bbn.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Hi All,

with respect to the draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt

"The following table summarizes the relationship between the "Next Header"
value in the packet and SPD and the *derived Port Selector value for the
SPD and SAD.*"

Above paragraph says that derive the port selectors value for both SPD and
SAD. Why one should derive the port selectors value for SPD. I think the
port selectors value for the SPD is determined by the adminstrator not by
the "Next Header" value in the packet and SPD. I think we have derive the
port selectors value only for the SAD. 

Thanks

No SPD K. SrinivasRao
Re: No SPD Charles Lynn
Re: No SPD Stephen Kent