IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] [dane] IPSEC & DANE (RFC4025)

Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca> Mon, 20 August 2012 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C4521F8678; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.224, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6l6RB+ma+7qV; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCE721F8667; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id B847580555; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:33:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD65804D0; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:33:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:33:47 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-X-Sender: paul@bofh.nohats.ca
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgvfqxgVLgqz9TdHbUBUGruziAoYFxg5+mndTiWUew9sw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208201333140.21383@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207311128220.2140@bofh.nohats.ca> <4896.1343757791@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207311649030.5708@bofh.nohats.ca> <25977.1343775649@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAMm+LwgvfqxgVLgqz9TdHbUBUGruziAoYFxg5+mndTiWUew9sw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [dane] IPSEC & DANE (RFC4025)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:34:25 -0000

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> Is the answer to this problem possibly that DNS records to configure
> IPSEC should go in the reverse DNS?

Been there, done that in 1995, did not work.

Paul

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status