IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)

Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us> Wed, 19 February 1997 21:35 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa07561; 19 Feb 97 16:35 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28619; 19 Feb 97 16:35 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA26974 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 16:24:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702192113.NAA00756@imo.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
From: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 13:12:59 -0800
To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
Reply-To: dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us
References: <199702191959.LAA10030@fluffy.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

The yes-compress/no-compression discussion is akin to
comparing Pepsi and Coke. Let's put a framework in place and
make it optional and negotiated. Let empirical data determine
its usefulness.


-dpg

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status