Re: [IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

Dan Brown <> Mon, 08 April 2013 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6BE21F8F6C for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.629
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IofB6ilOZIx3 for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362CF21F934D for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a412830-b7f2f6d000007c2a-83-51633e4824a1
Received: from ( []) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (SBG) with SMTP id 1C.0A.31786.84E33615; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:01:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ([fe80::fcd6:cc6c:9e0b:25bc]) by ([fe80::b815:71ef:9f8f:e07c%16]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:01:43 -0400
From: Dan Brown <>
To: "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
Thread-Index: AQHONKJ+NLt7HaOtnk2NvnDv7KiS3JjM4ApA
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:01:43 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5bjwvK6HXXKgwcctKhb7t7xgs7i1/gur A5PHkiU/mTw+z77KHMAU1cBok5RYUhacmZ6nb2eTmJeXX5JYkqqQklqcbKvkk5qemKMQUJRZ lphcqeCSWZyck5iZm1qkpJCZYqtkoqRQkJOYnJqbmldiq5RYUJCal6Jkx6WAAWyAyjLzFFLz kvNTMvPSbZU8g/11LSxMLXUNlex0Ezp5Mn6/bWQuOMdX8XX7DuYGxiaeLkZODgkBE4lJm48x QthiEhfurWfrYuTiEBJoZ5I4NrGXCcLZwigx4ddlNpAqNgFViftHzzGD2CICERKvO84ygdjC Ap4S/e8uM0HEvSS6j3xhhLCNJBavh6hhEVCRWDyngR3E5hVwkzjaepQFxOYUsJHYeXg3K4jN KCArsfvsdbB6ZgFxiVtP5jNBXCcgsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/rBC2osSLyedYIOr1JG5MncIGYWtL LFv4mhlil6DEyZlPWCYwisxCMnYWkpZZSFpmIWlZwMiyilEwN6PYwMwwOS9ZrygzVy8vtWQT IzjyNQx2ML5/b3GIUYCDUYmH96BZcqAQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEd5uQ6AQb0piZVVqUX58UWlO avEhRldgSExkluJOzgcmpbySeGMDA9wcJXHe38LRgUIC6cA0k52aWpBaBDOHiYMTZA+XlEgx MFmkFiWWlmTEg1JafDEwqUk1MIqaXjJv7bO/dXrLV7Gax7ozZBouXd/ze2X5u8Ou/Itmnv4b +08vZBrjwj8ztPpn/JUxffzyptmWpstrD5ZqF4Sdv5ZSwHLQdqOLo9W3zxnPdrzPXxsgNvmP +npeX+cjk8Im+73c7rCn5c9KIXsFm+aE54ukWmVWLPN1iPjzNCZhWbvrdaMP0sZKLMUZiYZa zEXFiQDZC/H0PQMAAA==
Subject: Re: [IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:02:05 -0000

Looks fine, please publish.

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Hoffman []
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 05:46 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: IPsecme WG <>
Subject: [IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

[[ So far, we have received only *one* review of this document, from Tero. If we don't receive more reviews, the document might not progress due to lack of interest. Please review this document within the next week and contribute your review to the list. ]]

Greetings. This is the start of the WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks; the WG period will end in two weeks, on April 15. The current draft is available at

Given that this will be a Standards Track document, it is important for it to be reviewed by as many people as possible. Possible results of individual reviewing the document are:

- "Looks fine, please publish"

- "Looks fine, here are some comments"

- "Has some problems, here they are"

- Other things of that sort

Many people on this mailing list are IPsec implementers but are mostly or completely silent on the mailing list. If you are one of those people, doing a WG Last Call review is a good way to participate usefully in the WG. Please strongly consider (a) reading the current draft and (b) sending a message to the list with your short or long review. If there are too few reviews on this document, we could get pushback from the IESG about the document.

--Paul Hoffman
IPsec mailing list

IPsec mailing list

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.