Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Jim Thompson <jim@smallworks.com> Tue, 18 June 1996 05:23 UTC
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa24609; 18 Jun 96 1:23 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id BAA28661; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 01:25:15 -0400
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028659; Tue, 18 Jun 96 01:24:47 -0400
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA16266; Tue, 18 Jun 96 01:24:45 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id BAA28656; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 01:24:45 -0400
Received: from hosaka.smallworks.com(192.207.126.1) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028654; Tue, 18 Jun 96 01:24:43 -0400
Received: from butthead.SmallWorks.COM by hosaka.smallworks.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA06618; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 00:27:15 -0500
Received: by butthead.SmallWorks.COM (4.1/SPARCbook_POP1.3) id AA11636; Tue, 18 Jun 96 00:23:13 CDT
From: Jim Thompson <jim@smallworks.com>
Message-Id: <9606180023.ZM11634@butthead.smallworks.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 00:23:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com> "Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents" (Jun 17, 8:29pm)
References: <199606180329.UAA02531@servo.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10oct95)
To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>, chk@border.com
Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Cc: ipsec@TIS.COM
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
On Jun 17, 8:29pm, Phil Karn wrote: > Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents > >Filed: Sep. 13, 1994 > >Filed: Jan. 19, 1994 > > All the basic concepts of IP Security (especially including what we > now call "tunnel mode") have been widely and publicly known since at > least the original "lunch BOF" that I called at the San Diego IETF > meeting way back in 1992. So the validity of these patents is not > only seriously in doubt, but there is also the interesting question of > fraud against the PTO for not disclosing all known relevant prior art. > > Phil > > >-- End of excerpt from Phil Karn When the IETF last met in Washington D.C. (I think that was the summer of 1992), there was a lunch where you, I, ji, and someone else where as far as I know, the original discussion of using ji's IPIP with encryption (e.g. tunnel-mode) was discussed. JI had mentioned something similar when I was visiting him at Columbia several months prior to this. In addition: ftp.cs.columbia.edu:pub/ji/swipe-26ietf.ps is dated Apr 8, 1993. ftp.cs.columbia.edu:pub/ji/usenix-sec93.ps.Z is dated Aug 18, 1993. ftp.cs.columbia.edu:pub/ji/swipeusenix.ps is dated Sep 21, 1993. Jim
- UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jack De Winter
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Ioannidis
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Per Unell
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Gilmore
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents MarkVon
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Joe Tardo
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jonathan M. Smith
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent John Gilmore
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent Jonathan M. Smith