Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> Mon, 22 April 2013 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Johannes.Merkle@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BDC21F8A53 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGHxMmfYNPkn for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3C621F88A9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB66A1A00A0; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id G5s8ULkwwg8W; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:58:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-srv1.secumail.de (unknown [10.53.40.200]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C281A007A; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:58:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.208.1.73] ([10.208.1.73]) by mail-srv1.secumail.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:58:31 +0200
Message-ID: <517525E6.1080500@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:58:30 +0200
From: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks@tools.ietf.org
References: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2013 11:58:31.0799 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5A8B870:01CE3F50]
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, "Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@arubanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:58:35 -0000

> Based on the amount of new material, I want to have another (albeit shorter) WG Last Call for this new version of the draft. Please send comments to the WG by Monday, April 29. Note that if you did not participate in the earlier WG Last Call, you are strongly urged to do so now: the more review we get for our WG drafts, the better. Having said that, it would be useful to hear from those who commented in the first WG Last Call to say whether the changes are sufficient.
> 


Please include draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool as informative reference and include in Section 2.3 a reference to it.
Our draft defines new elliptic curves for IKEv2 for which the checks specified in Section 2.3 are applicable and is
about to be published as RFC (RFC Ed Queue). This means that our draft will update the registry before your draft does.

Otherwise, our draft would have to wait for your draft to be published which would introduce a considerable delay. For
this reason, IANA has requested from us to resolve the current deadlock.


-- 
Johannes