IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 13 March 2021 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072C33A0FCA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:01:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEZKVBNArWqR for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42263A0FC9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:40::146]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696ED1F44E; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 8D0921A02D3; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:01:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <24646.13043.855619.794128@fireball.acr.fi>
References: <24646.13043.855619.794128@fireball.acr.fi>
Comments: In-reply-to Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> message dated "Mon, 08 Mar 2021 16:21:39 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:01:29 -0500
Message-ID: <1508626.1615672889@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/8i_9VG6eh13BdViYSswZEnNmKOU>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:01:35 -0000

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
    > This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending
    > 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
    > this document as WG document to this list.

I support adoption.
I am frustrated with the WG because we've been talking about this for at
least two years (maybe four?): documents don't need to be perfect to be adopted.

So, just do it already.
Please plan to WGLC this before the next IETF.

I'd *like* section 3 to enumerate the claims clearer (Maybe just new
paragraphs).  Pretty much each sentence is a claim, and I think that they
should point to references.  That will make it much more impactful a
document in my opinion.
But, I'd rather publish it if adding such references is hard.

I think that the third paragraph (labelled IPsec) should be a new section
3.1.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email