Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 21 April 2013 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B1B21F937D for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mslI71qNlxkv for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2934321F9305 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9161720168 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 98AA263A58; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5AE63A57 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
References: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:13:57 -0400
Message-ID: <29164.1366575237@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:14:32 -0000

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> writes:
    Paul> Greetings again. The authors of the DH checks draft have
    Paul> submitted a significantly-revised draft based on the input of
    Paul> the WG Last Call. See
    Paul> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-02
    Paul> for the difference.

I don't see my suggested text for section 2.2, or any change to the text.

At this point, I understand what section 2.2 is trying to say
sufficiently well that I can't really tell if the existing text is clear
enough for me.

    Paul> Based on the amount of new material, I want to have another
    Paul> (albeit shorter) WG Last Call for this new version of the
    Paul> draft. Please send comments to the WG by Monday, April

The additional material seems clear enough to me.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [