Re: new draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp?

"Michael C. Richardson" <> Tue, 24 February 1998 13:58 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by (8.8.2/8.8.2) id IAA23997 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:58:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Re: new draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:42:41 +0200." <>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:10:36 -0500
From: "Michael C. Richardson" <>
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> "Tero" == Tero Kivinen <> writes:
    >> >Does this have to be 96bits? Since a payload length is included can't
    >> this >just be an opaque blob whose length is determined by the payload
    >> length >field?

    Tero> I think it might be simplier to just allow it to be any length, and
    Tero> not to restrict to 96 bits. There is no reason to truncate it and
    Tero> if someone wants to use hash truncated to 96 bits he can do it.

  I have no objections, it was simply my first thought.

   :!mcr!:            |  Sandelman Software Works Corporation, Ottawa, ON  
   Michael Richardson |Network and security consulting and contract programming
 Personal: <A HREF=""></A>. PGP key available.
 Corporate: <A HREF=""></A>.