IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-03

"Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com> Fri, 21 August 2009 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <julienl@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D609D3A6949 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxyiHCYPhCEx for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00EE3A68B0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=julienl@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1250815067; x=1282351067; h=from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Laganier,=20Julien"=20<julienl@qualcomm.com> |To:=20"ipsec@ietf.org"=20<ipsec@ietf.org>|Date:=20Thu, =2020=20Aug=202009=2017:37:44=20-0700|Subject:=20RE:=20WG =20Last=20Call:=20draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-03 |Thread-Topic:=20WG=20Last=20Call:=20draft-ietf-ipsecme-r oadmap-03|Thread-Index:=20Acn84GccXdkwAkW2QlWsL8kxCqVagwd G+9MQAf4z7LA=3D|Message-ID:=20<BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186 FCA57F1C24BE409B@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>|References: =20<7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8E8ABD594E4@il-ex01.ad .checkpoint.com>=0D=0A=20<7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC 80158E120A80B@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>|In-Reply-To:=20< 7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80158E120A80B@il-ex01.ad.c heckpoint.com>|Accept-Language:=20en-US|Content-Language: =20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach:|X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: |acceptlanguage:=20en-US|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20 charset=3D"us-ascii"|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee =3Bi=3D"5300,2777,5715"=3B=20a=3D"22413784"; bh=+6yd+TIvT1q1u4xur86kRpFNZdVKZhWnKlMErF2Q0Os=; b=xJRYlD8TcExIcKWEUFoJo012v4cfAnI6I9tRmYqWklgWGBRx6/F7JIXY 4p5BD8Z6E9wDU1MuiDpALsnw8LItWE4PyPk0K1t6hBR0+h0k72EvH4Zy2 rDNIMdpWxpZ81sfnzaRTLiKyVMRvP0dP3toJy1NfCnpOVnURspmr7gx/4 E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5715"; a="22413784"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO numenor.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Aug 2009 17:37:47 -0700
Received: from msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (msgtransport01.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.148]) by numenor.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n7L0blfu004331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:47 -0700
Received: from nasanexhub05.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhub05.na.qualcomm.com [129.46.134.219]) by msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n7L0bkRC023535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:47 -0700
Received: from nalasexhc03.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.129.194) by nasanexhub05.na.qualcomm.com (129.46.134.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.358.0; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:46 -0700
Received: from NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.7.118]) by nalasexhc03.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.129.194]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:46 -0700
From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:44 -0700
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-03
Thread-Index: Acn84GccXdkwAkW2QlWsL8kxCqVagwdG+9MQAf4z7LA=
Message-ID: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C24BE409B@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8E8ABD594E4@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80158E120A80B@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80158E120A80B@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-03
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:37:42 -0000

Greetings,

I have reviewed this document and I think it's in good shape but I however have one technical comment that I'd like to discuss.

In Section 3.4. "Additions to IPsec", "RFC 4891, Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels" is marked as optional. I do not understand the significance of marking this as optional because:

1) 4891 is informational and only describes a set of configuration settings rather than a protocol, and,

2) an IPsec traffic selector can discriminate based on "Next Layer Protocol" and thus can be used to realize 4891.
 
So I'm thinking 4891 requirement level should be N/A rather than optional.

The exact same reasoning seems to apply to "RFC 3884, Use of IPsec Transport Mode for Dynamic Routing" which is also marked as optional.

What do you think?

--julien

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status