IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] [I2nsf] Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-03 (Sections 8 - 9)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 11 December 2018 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0970E130F14; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:59:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C1vaSJMjihmF; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642AE12E036; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DskY0lSyzG8X; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:59:17 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1544561957; bh=6hx1lXi/ZwAqUY67vHPT43p/jFMNry4gV4+0lj0mibI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XMFYTZlTtLvCK8OUFyXxM7aBhuETvoi98iLd2K2uM84+oCK2CU8HB1LoKPDv2DEAf lVlKn48+A9jeHZQkjbb+vsDEiyf37fEBGDW/ZQQBz4O2TOFKgX5G2jCq2Zhm2xLwXY iKM1UFwzsuE+PYs1QYCXMzMI9CUQfLWV2IoM2t1A=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1teXh0kb46A; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:59:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:59:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F42202E75A2; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:59:14 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca F42202E75A2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB906407AA79; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:59:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:59:14 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Fernando Pereñíguez García <fernando.pereniguez@cud.upct.es>
cc: ynir.ietf@gmail.com, i2nsf@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, Rafa Marin Lopez <rafa@um.es>, Gabriel López Millán <gabilm@um.es>
In-Reply-To: <CAB=gXc66hBpXBMOzkwXeH-ORrQWO47as4-TPQDe591_Zi=CKDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812111558510.22818@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <A881C135-9BF7-4E93-BB7A-75EB3D1FF605@gmail.com> <6839D47C-4074-486F-9350-8EB7B378036C@um.es> <DAE14995-8504-4134-B021-93D56A4994FB@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811180149220.25604@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAB=gXc66hBpXBMOzkwXeH-ORrQWO47as4-TPQDe591_Zi=CKDQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/C_4EN-oL1OZOAyjN_5-M-ZNTLRc>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [I2nsf] Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-03 (Sections 8 - 9)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:59:20 -0000

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, Fernando Pereñíguez García wrote:

These answers look fine. Thanks.

Paul
(the other emails will take a little more time :)

> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:52:13
> From: Fernando Pereñíguez García <fernando.pereniguez@cud.upct.es>
> Cc: ynir.ietf@gmail.com, i2nsf@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org,
>     Rafa Marin Lopez <rafa@um.es>, Gabriel López Millán <gabilm@um.es>
> To: paul@nohats.ca
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-03
>     (Sections 8 - 9)
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> 
> Hi Paul, all,
> Next you can find our answers to your comments on sections 8 and 9. 
> 
> 
> Section 8:
> 
> Is this section supposed to be an "Implementation Details" Section as per RFC 7942? If so, it is missing the required
> note to the RFC Editor to remove the entire section before publication as RFC.
> 
> [Authors]
> 
> Agree. We will include it.
> 
> 
> Section 9.1:
> 
> In case 1, add a note to use only strong PSKs, with a minimal length and strength.
> 
> [Authors]
> Agree. We will add it.
> 
> Section 9.2:
> 
> when ESP is used
> 
> Hoping my advise is taken to only use ESP and not AH, and to use ESP-null in the case of encryption being unwanted, please
> remove this comment as ESP would always be used.
> 
> includes the keys for integrity and encryption
> 
> If we only allow AEAD's, maybe rewrite or leave this out.
> 
> [Authors]
> 
> s/"In the case 2, the controller sends the IPsec SA information to the SAD that includes the keys for integrity and encryption (when ESP is used)" / 
> "In the case 2, the controller sends the IPsec SA information to the SAD that includes the required cryptographic keys for ESP or AH"
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando.
> 
>  
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fernando Pereñíguez García, PhD
> Department of Sciences and Informatics
> University Defense Center, (CUD), San Javier Air Force Base, MDE-UPCT
> C/ Coronel Lopez Peña, s/n, 30720, San Javier, Murcia - SPAIN
> Tel: +34 968 189 946 Fax: +34 968 189 970
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email