Re: doi-07/interoperability questions
Ben Rogers <ben@Ascend.COM> Tue, 10 March 1998 19:08 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA11563 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 14:08:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 14:20:47 -0500
Message-Id: <199803101920.OAA08417@carp.morningstar.com>
From: Ben Rogers <ben@Ascend.COM>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: doi-07/interoperability questions
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980310135454.00959830@homebase.htt-consult.com>
References: <199803101550.KAA08137@carp.morningstar.com> <3.0.5.32.19980310135454.00959830@homebase.htt-consult.com>
Reply-To: ben@Ascend.COM
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Yes. In fact, I was thinking specifically about gateway to gateway configurations using both AH and ESP. Robert Moskowitz writes: > At 10:50 AM 3/10/98 -0500, Ben Rogers wrote: > > I believe you are talking about where the transforms all end at the same > system not the case where the transport is end to end and the tunnel is > gateway to gateway. > > >My other question centers on the use of Encapsulation Mode attributes in > >combined (AND) proposal transforms. Namely, it seems obvious that we > >should support the case where both are transport mode (Case 1.3 in > >section 4.5 of arch-sec), and not support the case where both are tunnel > >(probably returning a BAD-PROPSAL-SYNTAX). However, I'm not too clear > >as to whether I should support mixed proposals. My opinion is that it > >makes sense to support AH (transport) and ESP (tunnel) with the > >following encapsulation: > > > >[IP2][AH][ESP][IP1][upper] > > > >and to not support AH (tunnel) and ESP (transport). Does anyone else > >have any feelings on this matter? Whatever we choose probably ought to > >be added as clarifying text to [IPDOI]. > > > > > >ben > > > > > Robert Moskowitz > ICSA > Security Interest EMail: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com
- doi-07/interoperability questions Ben Rogers
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Robert Moskowitz
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Ben Rogers
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Derrell D. Piper
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Ben Rogers
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Robert Moskowitz
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Eric L. Wong
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Ben Rogers
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions C. Harald Koch
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Yan-Fa LI
- RE: doi-07/interoperability questions CJ Gibson
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Eric L. Wong
- Re: doi-07/interoperability questions Stephen Kent