IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns

Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov> Tue, 17 September 1996 14:54 UTC

Received: from [192.94.214.100] by neptune.TIS.COM id aa04874; 17 Sep 96 10:54 EDT
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id KAA01505; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:58:14 -0400
Received: from sol.hq.tis.com(10.33.1.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001495; Tue, 17 Sep 96 10:57:53 -0400
Received: from relay.hq.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA03063; Tue, 17 Sep 96 10:57:01 EDT
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id KAA01486; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:57:44 -0400
Received: from fnal.fnal.gov(131.225.110.17) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001470; Tue, 17 Sep 96 10:57:15 -0400
Received: from munin.fnal.gov ("port 3230"@munin.fnal.gov) by FNAL.FNAL.GOV (PMDF V5.0-5 #3998) id <01I9KXTLUESQ002K6R@FNAL.FNAL.GOV>; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:59:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost.fnal.gov by munin.fnal.gov (8.7.3/SMI-4.1-m) id JAA10216; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:57:28 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:57:27 -0500
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: Concerns
In-Reply-To: "16 Sep 1996 17:31:56 EDT." <"9609162131.AA16163"@dcl.MIT.EDU>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ipsec@TIS.COM
Message-Id: <199609171457.JAA10216@munin.fnal.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Face: /RKQi"kntyd}7l)d8n%'Dum<~(aMW3,5g&'NiH5I4Jj|wT:j; Qa$!@A<~/*C:{:MmAQ:o%S /KKi}G4_.||4I[9!{%3]Hd"a*E{<k&QF?d6L7o&zLqb%kXn!!]ykXMKtTiy9#20]$EKP/^Z$T]'P6, 8L#r&mH4PB<ljN,_.=iCpv#N:HIcy5t7{HV:<=g=V?^;-d,J*xkq0r
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

> Well, at the IPSEC wg, [...] the vast
> majority of the room were from vendor-types who said, "we don't care
> which one you choose; we're not competent to make that choice.  But we
> don't have to implement two solutions.  Pick one."

When Jeff Schiller asked how many had no preference, the number who
raised their hands was a very very small fraction -- perhaps 15 to 20
people in all.
_________________________________________________________
Matt Crawford          crawdad@fnal.gov          Fermilab
  PGP: D5 27 83 7A 25 25 7D FB  09 3C BA 33 71 C4 DA 6A

Message-Id: <199609171500.LAA27735@jekyll.piermont.com>
To: Hilarie Orman <ho@earth.hpc.org>
Cc: danmcd@pacific-86.eng.sun.com, ipsec@TIS.COM
Subject: Re: Using SKIP as inspiration, not a 
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:00:53 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Hilarie Orman writes:
> Is there then consensus for including in-line keys with a non-PFS key
> determination mode as a required component of a key distribution
> protocol?

I don't think so, but I suspect the folks from the Sun Internet
Commerce Group will differ. :)

Perry

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status