IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: is manual keying mandatory

William Dixon <wdixon@microsoft.com> Wed, 18 March 1998 21:38 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA08283 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:38:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <E301AC63A589D111B63100805F15808901000C18@red-msg-07.dns.microsoft.com>
From: William Dixon <wdixon@microsoft.com>
To: 'Roy Pereira' <rpereira@TimeStep.com>, "IPSEC Mailing List (E-mail)" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: RE: is manual keying mandatory
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:51:35 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2166.0)
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Since we have put so much effort into IKE now, I don't think it should be a
MUST.

Wm
William Dixon,
Program Manager,  IP Security
Windows Networking Product Group


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Roy Pereira [SMTP:rpereira@TimeStep.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 18, 1998 1:15 PM
> To:	IPSEC Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject:	is manual keying mandatory
> 
> Is manual keying a required feature of IPSec?  
> In other words, if you do not support manual keying then are you
> IPSec-compliant or not?
> 
> There seams to bea bit of confusion surrounding this topic and I would
> like to see what people think.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status