IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-16.txt

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC05128E18 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWuyzVMubh4r for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E0B1293EB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v186so75274369wmd.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Z8OiRNSCFAIxTa1E0Oqfpt3GSMBQyuVHRC7U7wzh+bg=; b=gN/q5Dk8y/1H7u6Nqj0INV0FKv9sbTWTZPXCj4XWHpT3trX9sbazxRnN/NV6OVZPDn noFHPyXqwVHd+HfqJDlbMSIEgfGtCB40qH8xQjQ0RKSL82a/qwWQWWmy6v4aDnKXeraK wAe58JOVLfzaNfIkbcrVdI9nJ/CZAn6O6PzKmwOML4nsUsGzT3yV8QXnU8m5+oQHewCK 2NiukGI7mLpJLmo77I83//GNpJUSRs974XKZ57tB/A9DOUEVAr2M3eQ7r08h/IithGxm QS8HkrWLubUwGaUg/Y9/N6aM/SrP5SNxLXGvqNAJ7nScny1IvMxWNQKrceTOL8O+q2fA ujoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Z8OiRNSCFAIxTa1E0Oqfpt3GSMBQyuVHRC7U7wzh+bg=; b=uP+FZtbd0JgckrPxUpL+K6VOPFCoOPQCsy4nofqq0gpLn8RT4XDFN7nrb5MBxYhvjl 1lSVFJvXLq0QorhHn6OBwtDoS+HCeZVbZupum2trw++A8YM4/Zh6NQ6RBhlBnNyHXdJy 6w4XthtMQKVg8oPrTAi/7eHlDxzbKtbSoqNmHa5bZDaYMI303yn1eWYuBEbEZS5Dl66X Fwf28+MGW35H2026Ld1mjGysoLPzNoWYaLyWQbUuFB5U21TUqhXfU6iW8NuqD8hvHzFz nN0KpkPEkbvrZG8t5AJogAh0lCdD19ezaWoUd71FvJxcaH45u7qwyvgwyKloz8W25VJT MSqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mdAE4DWIoniwXDxxhzmqWVXLPtLjh6dHpjTYaCoLVzeu2ApWkvhCE2sMdLfHt2IA==
X-Received: by 10.28.135.82 with SMTP id j79mr13650559wmd.19.1487275897964; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p62sm1466179wmb.25.2017.02.16.12.11.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <67136360-A026-42D5-9171-111DC9C2A5C1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AD470999-4F2B-45DE-B68E-5159611D0BC2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:11:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702161332510.26069@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
References: <148726992363.1011.1624468258017505370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702161332510.26069@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/EmcRpJ1bb7_plVHjjHAWQ1Fc9L8>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-16.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:11:41 -0000

Almost there. You didn’t reverse the complementary public keys (g**b or g**a) instead of (g**a or g**b)

> On 16 Feb 2017, at 20:35, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
>> Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-16.txt
> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-16
> 
> This version incorporates the suggestions of ekr/yoav to remove the
> claim that AES-GCM has better key longevity and rewrites the DH attack
> line as suggested by them.
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email