[IPsec] Fwd: Re: AD VPN next steps - pls review

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 February 2014 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8BB1A0214 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFAPSqFcC319 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51671A0207 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id lf10so1114236pab.18 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:41:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4sGcpMVnQKuX8tlhOtH8sEdQ9FO6aL+k/0cEL4vmpgI=; b=KHjYZ+xH3HrqyKt3idm5RW9yt5Wfj56e//BPogOgqvanHihPe2uABGcRAAzjdzuuQh +EGj53zIAV1o9eFVfg72nc6QxlRhuunePawgGh7IrgDrvH8rdXpLUTaDI9Y59Wj7o03h F5VYc2UR65kgQgtdSr/54b2iZimp6Ivg4CqTEIANCKaFnhDDuimxFW3Hf2o1fNCOHTsU rS2hGnQl7oc6de9HFy6jJgjIChbu5kESnutTU7SOtnWSMRfmfCzJemIRmQO9ylxBrbG5 2GRlxOc9iDJZtVo5db00AHSrxV8zziW3vUvzru1ifFmwtjdqiZXhp6TG9aLo0kL3ps9I DWeA==
X-Received: by 10.68.197.40 with SMTP id ir8mr7974772pbc.138.1391654516974; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:41:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.230] (c-67-169-181-102.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.181.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vg1sm81402179pbc.44.2014.02.05.18.41.55 for <ipsec@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:41:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52F2F672.5010009@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:41:54 -0800
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <B96D042B-D682-41D3-A16A-FB5E4BC73F25@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B96D042B-D682-41D3-A16A-FB5E4BC73F25@vpnc.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <B96D042B-D682-41D3-A16A-FB5E4BC73F25@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPsec] Fwd: Re: AD VPN next steps - pls review
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:42:00 -0000

Dear IPsec folks,

Two months ago we requested input from the list to determine the
group's consensus on a protocol candidate for auto-discovery VPN.
Sadly, we received too few responses from non-authors (exactly 9),
which we deem insufficient to determine consensus on such a major
work item.

Paul and I have decided to call this activity off. Although there is
certainly industry interest in AD VPN, we seem to lack WG energy to
move forward.

We request and encourage the authors of both leading proposals
(draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn and draft-detienne-dmvpn) to
publish them as individually submitted RFCs. Note however that we do not 
know how the Security ADs or the IETF community will want to handle two 
competing proposals.

Thanks,
	Yaron