Re: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey

Support this draft to go on to IETF review.

I have read this draft and feel that it is useful to let IKEv2 support more types of raw public keys, such as ECC.
The certificate encoding has used a new format and obsoleted the old RSA public key format "11".
And if such an old encoding is received, it MUST NOT be considered as a fatal error.

One typo found: at the last sentence in Sec 3. "needs to followed" should be "needs to be followed".

BR Yang
==================
 Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
 Huawei Technologies
 cuiyang@huawei.com

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Yaron
> Sheffer
> 发送时间: 2013年4月22日 15:29
> 收件人: Paul Hoffman; IPsecme WG
> 主题: Re: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
> 
> We have still not heard any additional responses for this last call. If
> you think this draft is useful, please say so on the list. If you think
> it needs to be fixed, please send your comments.
> 
> We are extending this LC until Friday of this week.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron
> 
> On 2013-04-17 18:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > We have gotten exactly one response to this, even though there were lots of
> people who said they thought this was a valuable addition to IKEv2. Please
> comment before Monday so we don't have to abandon the work.
> >
> > --Paul Hoffman
> >
> > On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings again. This begins the WG Last Call on
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey, "More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2". You can find
> the current draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
> >>
> >> This document generated a fair amount of interest early, but we have not
> had much discussion since. Yaron and I would *really* like to have at least five
> WG members review the document and say on the list whether or not they
> think it is ready in its current state to move to IETF review. If you read it and
> feel it is not ready for any reason, please also say that in your message to the
> list.
> >>
> >> Again, participating in WG Last Calls is a great opportunity for those who
> are less active in the WG but who want to contribute to the IETF to make a
> difference.
> >>
> >> The WG Last Call should end in two weeks, on April 22. Please review the
> document before then. Thanks in advance!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPsec mailing list
> > IPsec@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec