IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-07

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 02 April 2021 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C592D3A341B for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JELmSu_sQU5 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8EC3A3418 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id v15so6185828lfq.5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=+evD0P0j5z8+rpzTvi0komM+ouPj18OniB/BfMQMoD0=; b=NDJHs18/8ijb4JLw0brMcy6LU2a1fxBr5Rm5+vWCjeRp1q1VdGN7C7QRQcxMRiloGx f2w1Cx11VShjcfMjyzwgdksfVh8i54d/Lwkxhy5BpLyIBggLxAlRi17zSXFEo8J6pCrz I75pGWsAhTfUEeNv1MqSakCpxXK57y15Ez5hpt08UGipNyTn+nI/QyDBtRrrbqNnUdRx 6giXBTB7QRoUTpN3HI8QU7Tpf1dUapfEOygDxqxaUenCGvf8G16aS/GLWjKqEEWE8anV PsoLxdTQ34IdDUlH+i9nk5JV1YRhKmgzwxqOrgHOKQJvLN6MmY4ywQ7SHXEZVyhV+KQb BH4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=+evD0P0j5z8+rpzTvi0komM+ouPj18OniB/BfMQMoD0=; b=UavSFY11FKRLCsiWT3EIU5Lxl3YvRNekIBq/3rbaW5s5KF07fiYXoO0IUDtUWePNjl 3W08veQkpi+Sn1HaAF1lNO32OFJdD11yh+HtzETC3q9jLEso5M37g3ZiQwviwGRaVvR9 KAIqjDhv0IqjXJ4ehTitlVlbOwLQFrmw35zpLek348LxkUn176tGDAtN8zGLbhHUYtFF JwVnlnqo8Kc+x/nal+7j2HHvDJpCvN9Da3lRmSO26XZjdS6N3nLgBd7r6JXlJCgHoC/w feRFdUSc0cWmyn/ae/oHzeFaCRWnKxfMWxJ4+Xoyc3LD3lFRjyw5HJ4ml9fC1Tw7Y2fj Wjxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HTwNkKsFS5ZEcBgIM4bFlBUCMCsmPnfugHqZggYAek7kLzW/m jhuZ2TI1BeQ99FlBU81sUpw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpeAtasAqUMCd79kLvOEPqXdzIVIm+pa24wWtG+8EaOLI/lrKEPb0q6rfQgMzuJNI4vR5JYQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:518e:: with SMTP id u14mr7571862lfi.225.1617343691117; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buildpc ([93.188.44.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m7sm754978lfg.285.2021.04.01.23.08.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Tero Kivinen' <kivinen@iki.fi>, "'Bottorff, Paul'" <paul.bottorff@hpe.com>
Cc: 'IPsec' <ipsec@ietf.org>, antony.antony@secunet.com
References: <CS1PR8401MB11928BE251D4B6E05184D941FE619@CS1PR8401MB1192.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20210331103220.GA21137@moon.secunet.de> <CS1PR8401MB119267E038AFBDFD996F0441FE7C9@CS1PR8401MB1192.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <24678.19440.553333.890224@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <24678.19440.553333.890224@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:08:13 +0300
Message-ID: <036401d72786$91047b90$b30d72b0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFvBFBeVc8YQwtquwQS75oQnz2WTQJRErFpANOS/JYCNRDTH6tGNXFQ
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/Gl81TCi8NlB7erJN74JXrgz_0UQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-07
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:08:18 -0000

Hi Tero,

> For the load balancing I think it is enough for just one of the ports
> to be different, thus initiator could simply allocate n random source
> port numbers, and initiate IKE from each of them to responder, and
> then create SAs for each of them separately, thus allowing load
> balancing using UDP encapsulation using existing hardware.

RFC 7791 + MOBIKE can be used to clone IKE SA  and move 
it to a different local IP+port.

Regards,
Valery.

> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email