IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation

"Rajeshwar Singh Jenwar (rsj)" <rsj@cisco.com> Sun, 19 May 2013 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsj@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE7121F8C98 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NcUA+yYJGQty for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBD821F8C38 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1781; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368932732; x=1370142332; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Hmi0ct59A9jfcQ5lv+yOh2BUCA5T4q/lCes9SJzzFA0=; b=meK3nga3t38v79NO3sCLND+o8WZQgeZAomTgyTmY/x+zYhrlTXkp7TL9 KX0Npkb+ysWqlnf3GQIuaLa+HtQOZYCLD97LfuRXzJyrTAXqq4n6u0CBo JgQw3UYkBx0TwFF6zZI9vQy31/CM504cSGAsM18zseljPsH2+naGyitpC U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiMFAFhAmFGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABbgwgwwTp/FnSCHwEBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQchBgsUCQgCBAENBQgTh2ADCQYMs0ENiGoEjEqCJjEHBoJtYQOVUo4DhSODD4Im
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,702,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="212209486"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2013 03:05:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4J35VrC023896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 May 2013 03:05:31 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.189]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 18 May 2013 22:05:31 -0500
From: "Rajeshwar Singh Jenwar (rsj)" <rsj@cisco.com>
To: "Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
Thread-Index: AQHOUlZ47d1B+ONwHEa/LihAWRnsr5kI0KeAgAMGEmA=
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 03:05:31 +0000
Message-ID: <AAB3D1882B58DF46B73D67CE475E7EA004A7C951@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <D49F3A1B-0BB0-4C48-84FB-00D8D86F0B3C@vpnc.org> <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com> <E4D705FB-5DD4-4256-B106-69C13A2715AB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4D705FB-5DD4-4256-B106-69C13A2715AB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.67.202]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 03:05:37 -0000

+1

Kind Regards,
Raj

-----Original Message-----
From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Weis (bew)
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 5:25 AM
To: Yaron Sheffer
Cc: IPsecme WG
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation


On May 16, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2 fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
> 
> Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the mailing list:
> 
> - The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an interoperable solution.
> - We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
> - And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a starting point.
> 
> Please send your approval, disapproval or comments to the list within a week (until May 23).

I approve.

[snip]

> Yaron: do we want to stay with the current TCP-based solution?
> 	Brian: might be running on sensors that don't have a TCP stack

Someone made this comment, but it wasn't me. 

I did mention that the current TCP-based solution has the advantage of only re-sending the missing TCP segment, whereas current and proposed UDP-based fragmentation solutions re-send all packet fragments. That could be valuable for a VPN gateway with many peers with a lossy network. But that doesn't seem enough of a justification to stay with the current TCP-based solution.

Brian
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email