IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: is manual keying mandatory

Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com> Thu, 19 March 1998 13:59 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id IAA16723 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 08:59:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <351126A1.863BD33B@ire-ma.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:07:29 -0500
From: Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com>
Reply-To: bkavsan@ire-ma.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
CC: "IPSEC Mailing List (E-mail)" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
References: <c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-980318211528Z-1390@tsntsrv2.timestep.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

I like Manual Keying and all the benefits of it - and I think it deserves
SHOULD or MAY. I don't love at the extent of a MUST ;-)

Roy Pereira wrote:

> Is manual keying a required feature of IPSec?
> In other words, if you do not support manual keying then are you
> IPSec-compliant or not?
>
> There seams to bea bit of confusion surrounding this topic and I would
> like to see what people think.



--
Bronislav Kavsan
IRE Secure Solutions, Inc.
100 Conifer Hill Drive  Suite 513
Danvers, MA  01923
voice: 978-739-2384
http://www.ire.com

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status