[IPsec] AD VPN document

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 November 2012 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C9D21F8843 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NihS25a63GDZ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE62121F8857 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w11so6641901bku.31 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgLDQ13Yjz1EuffR49hInXTyCczgt+b3WwoRW/BRJm0=; b=1A2P0RARE2eBtvyQIiEEFi2W3gz8gsGdNTAyMWSoGu2IIE2VIPxwhZR1qcOLmkU9Hv ZZNlFndeF0XDctTzOJvQt417wkxoO+CBDK/n4VzK0Lfx8l/ZXy6Z1WhTOMcJzsyPcAio IOBh1Qw55SXpvHgyqQ7MgqRJca/G1d3tGdPOmRteZXrsDk73kwbg/250PXcqFUNmySXr U0K+Ln6WRio79weo+QuBldw6oZgNfOWQvrxx+HsK9rp2nwhW0Y12AG9RK3FKqJqvKzKH wrgd0CofMj8tZwPqyJn6zhYkj/NLKQep84mJPQBU+NYAsv93Q5Ttjke1ng0Idcqa2o4M TPTQ==
Received: by with SMTP id l11mr6303978bkv.46.1354132128244; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (bzq-79-183-164-29.red.bezeqint.net. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm13620182bkw.5.2012. (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:48:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50B66A9C.8020001@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:48:44 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPsec] AD VPN document
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:48:50 -0000

Hi everyone,

Vishwas and Steve recently published version 01 of the Problem Statement 
( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-01). We 
have already gone through WG last call on this one, so I would like to 
ask those who commented on the previous version to verify that their 
inputs have been taken into account.

If no comments were missed, Paul and I will send the document to our AD 
within a week.

Moving forward on the auto-discovery VPN front, now is the time to start 
working on protocol proposals. We will not adopt any of them as WG items 
before the Requirements are stable (have gone through IETF and IESG 
review). But individual drafts are certainly welcome.