Re: Slicing and dicing

Dave Mason <> Tue, 09 September 1997 08:35 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by (8.8.2/8.8.2) id EAA24838 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 04:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 04:43:36 -0400
From: Dave Mason <>
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Re: Slicing and dicing
Precedence: bulk

>I'd suggest a clarification be added to the draft stating that bytes
>9-16 should be used in the event that bytes 1-8 are weak.

And that in the very unlikely event that 9-16 are also weak?  The draft
needs to cover this situation also, however unlikely.