Re: Slicing and dicing
Dave Mason <dmason@tis.com> Tue, 09 September 1997 08:35 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id EAA24838 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 04:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 04:43:36 -0400
From: Dave Mason <dmason@tis.com>
Message-Id: <199709090843.EAA14539@rubicon.rv.tis.com>
To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Slicing and dicing
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
>I'd suggest a clarification be added to the draft stating that bytes >9-16 should be used in the event that bytes 1-8 are weak. And that in the very unlikely event that 9-16 are also weak? The draft needs to cover this situation also, however unlikely. -dave
- Slicing and dicing Karl Fox
- Slicing and dicing Karl Fox
- Re: Slicing and dicing Dave Mason