[IPsec] Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5121315A7; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.47.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148958867307.4072.14018084445475450669@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:37:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/JdKJ29Q3ByHlWBOu4iplRvWT1FI>
Subject: [IPsec] Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:37:53 -0000

Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2017-03-15
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-31
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16

Summary:

Ready

Major issues:

None

Minor issues:

None

Nits/editorial comments: 

While using MUST, SHOULD, and MAY as nouns and adjectives causes me a
twitch, this document is just fine. There's a typo in the first
paragraph of 1.2.