[IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 20 April 2013 14:41 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B20A21F8E36 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9TCgbozotxX for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD2121F85CC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3KEfrcW063701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:56 -0700
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:41:55 -0000
Greetings again. The authors of the DH checks draft have submitted a significantly-revised draft based on the input of the WG Last Call. See http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-02 for the difference. Based on the amount of new material, I want to have another (albeit shorter) WG Last Call for this new version of the draft. Please send comments to the WG by Monday, April 29. Note that if you did not participate in the earlier WG Last Call, you are strongly urged to do so now: the more review we get for our WG drafts, the better. Having said that, it would be useful to hear from those who commented in the first WG Last Call to say whether the changes are sufficient. --Paul Hoffman
- [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-d… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsec… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsec… Johannes Merkle
- [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-d… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsec… Paul Hoffman