Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 9B20A21F8E36 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
 BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9TCgbozotxX for
 <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM
 [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
 1AD2121F85CC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173])
 (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
 r3KEfrcW063701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for
 <ipsec@ietf.org>;
 Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14A2C604-CDB7-4A37-A07F-627D8BFF85D0@vpnc.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:41:56 -0700
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [IPsec] New WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>,
 <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,
 <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:41:55 -0000

Greetings again. The authors of the DH checks draft have submitted a =
significantly-revised draft based on the input of the WG Last Call. See =
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-02 for =
the difference.

Based on the amount of new material, I want to have another (albeit =
shorter) WG Last Call for this new version of the draft. Please send =
comments to the WG by Monday, April 29. Note that if you did not =
participate in the earlier WG Last Call, you are strongly urged to do so =
now: the more review we get for our WG drafts, the better. Having said =
that, it would be useful to hear from those who commented in the first =
WG Last Call to say whether the changes are sufficient.

--Paul Hoffman=
