Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 16 November 2009 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276428C187 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:26:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d99aw1dc-M5r for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEF928C16F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp89-089-228.bbn.com ([128.89.89.228]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1NA4Ol-0006i6-CW; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:25:52 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240805c7272bb53718@[128.89.89.228]>
In-Reply-To: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350AB2C86581@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-luce nt.com>
References: <dc8fd0140911110805q67759507t6cf75a1e9d81c5aa@mail.gmail.com> <19200.8786.266973.313959@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350AB2C86306@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-luce nt.com> <19201.20208.563706.519993@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350AB2C86581@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-luce nt.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:18:52 -0500
To: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:26:03 -0000

At 7:50 PM +0530 11/16/09, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>This is an implementation specific optimization that has already 
>been solved in multiple implementations.
>
>Cheers, Manav

Is the phrase "implementation specific" a euphemism for non-standard?

Steve