[IPsec] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be
appreciated even if only for my own education).

Special thanks to Yoav Nir for the shepherd's write-up including the section
about the WG consensus.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

## Abstract

The abstract would benefit by adding a few use cases / applicability statement
(per the shepherd's write-up and introduction, i.e., a hint for PQ crypto).

## Section 1

s/If size of a message is large enough, IP fragmentation takes place/If size of
a message is larger than the MTU, IP fragmentation takes place/

RFC 7383 is dated 2014, is it still applicable in 2022 ?