Re: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 18 March 1998 01:45 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA21925 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:45:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:57:38 -0500
X-Sender: kent@po1.bbn.com (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v03110701b13437fac780@[128.89.30.10]>
In-Reply-To: <9803161853.aa10914@khitomer.epilogue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Bill Sommerfeld <wes@epilogue.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Bill,

I agree with your suggested editorial changes.  WRT the wildcarding, the
intent is to match exactly what is in IKE, to avoid negotiation vs. SPD
mismatches, so we will reword to better reflect that. The text about OPAQUE
transport protocols may be left over from when we distinguished between the
transport layer protocol and the "next" protocol as different selectors.
Since we simplified to a single selector, this text may not be necessary.

Steve

some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt Bill Sommerfeld
Re: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04… Stephen Kent