IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: is manual keying mandatory

"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> Fri, 20 March 1998 18:56 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id NAA00772 for ipsec-outgoing; Fri, 20 Mar 1998 13:56:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:10:16 -0500
Message-Id: <199803201910.OAA26923@dcl.MIT.EDU>
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Steve Sneddon's message of Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:16:00 -0800, <2.2.32.19980319221600.006f5894@trix.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
Address: 1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139
Phone: (617) 253-8091
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk


Can we please consider the issue of manual keying to be closed, please?
We've gone over this before many times --- and the only way to make
progress is to avoid continually revisiting issues which we've decided
in the past.  The Security Architecture document very clearly states
that manual keying is mandatory; there shouldn't be any confusion on
this issue at all.  Some of you may disagree with this decision, but we
decided this months ago.  Can we please give it a rest?

							- Ted

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status