IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: (with COMMENT)

Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru> Wed, 30 November 2022 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <svan@elvis.ru>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E374C14CF1E; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:06:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elvis.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BbNhqfevER3D; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from akmail.elvis.ru (akmail.elvis.ru [82.138.51.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7729C14CF1B; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:06:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elvis.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zhpkI3tvPKzVv1MAEzjgg/KcdEcC5LfUsK8m7B950qs=; b=AdPqFH8R3SbTGRDIryss+txd53 7XDX36xXPIZS0pftWbyFf7k7huBB/zVc9VY9Uk3rNMt0VIgVexBIwKmdoVCKDNQKToRqtFrscK4aS vmdte+FVmlbW2kE/C/gs7f74gQnXcQOhKlr4zzg7WXlYHX0pB2TAZEvr/t7n13f5ReEA=;
Received: from kmail.elvis.ru ([93.188.44.208]) by akmail.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1p0I6c-0001UF-Sx; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:06:11 +0300
Received: from mail16.office.elvis.ru ([10.111.1.29] helo=mail.office.elvis.ru) by kmail.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1p0I6c-0006uc-Lv; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:06:10 +0300
Received: from MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:06:10 +0300
Received: from buildpc (10.111.10.33) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1779.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:06:10 +0300
From: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
To: 'Erik Kline' <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi
References: <166977818762.24379.8382892185294512040@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166977818762.24379.8382892185294512040@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:06:12 +0300
Message-ID: <155201d90492$9c9c8520$d5d58f60$@elvis.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFlzJNGYWCIlZqBaVeGCusEqmUplq89bFrQ
Content-Language: ru
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned
X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1
X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings
X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2022/11/30 06:37:00
X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2022/11/30 05:53:00 #20627193
X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/LkTbkXQiqyfaksqvejA8WVy-rMM>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:06:26 -0000

Hi Erik,

thank you for your comments. Please see inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Kline via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 6:16 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke@ietf.org; ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org;
> kivinen@iki.fi; kivinen@iki.fi
> Subject: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> # Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10
> CC @ekline
> 
> ## Nits
> 
> ### S2
> 
> * s/FIPS complaint/FIPS compliant/

Funny typo :-) Fixed, thank you.

> ### S3.2.1
> 
> * I take it that it's not relevant to the example flow that there is no
>   transform called AKE4.  :-)

This was done on purpose, to illustrate the text in the para above:

   The initiator MAY propose non-consecutive Additional Key Exchange
   transforms, for example proposing Additional Key Exchange 2 and
   Additional Key Exchange 5 transforms only.

> ### S5
> 
> * "can dwarfed"?

This has been  already changed to:

    Simply increasing the key length can mitigate this attack.

by request from Sean.

The updated PR is available at:
https://github.com/post-quantum/ietf-pq-ikev2/pull/22

Regards,
Valery.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email