IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: is manual keying mandatory (fwd)

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Thu, 19 March 1998 14:08 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id JAA16911 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:08:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199803191421.JAA04709@jekyll.piermont.com>
To: Jackie Wilson <jhwilson@austin.ibm.com>
cc: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory (fwd)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Mar 1998 23:09:12 CST." <199803190509.XAA26210@jhwilson.austin.ibm.com>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:21:17 -0500
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Jackie Wilson writes:
> I agree.  It will be some time before all boxes support ISAKMP, but
> they will need to be included in secure networks.  This will help
> customers adopt ISAKMP as a standard if it is widely available.
> 
> In a few years it could probably be phased out.

I would be very against *ever* phasing out support for manual keying.

.pm

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status